Skip navigation
   

Home / Product_Info / Mobile phone Radiation / Cell Phone Radiation_Chart / News / FAQ's / Contact_Us / Francais

Alerts  Newsletters  RSS  Help  
MSN Home Hotmail Sign In
MSNBC News
Tech / Science
Science
Space News
Tech News/Reviews
Security
Wireless
Innovation
Games
News Video
U.S. News
World News
Business
Sports
Entertainment
Health
Tech / Science
Weather
Travel
Blogs Etc.
Local News
Newsweek
Multimedia
Most Popular
NBC NEWS
MSNBC TV
Today Show
Nightly News
Meet the Press
Dateline NBC
MSNBC ClassifiedsShoppingJobsPersonals with Perfectmatch.comAutosReal Estate with HomePages.com
Advertisement
MSNBC Home » Technology & Science » Wireless World Sponsored by 

Lawsuits over cell phone radiation to continue

Supreme Court declines to hear appeal by wireless companies

  MSN Tech & Gadgets
  RSS FEEDS ON MSNBC.COM

Add these headlines to your news reader

Wireless 
Updated: 10:51 p.m. ET Oct. 31, 2005

WASHINGTON - Class-action lawsuits against wireless telephone companies over radiation emissions will be able to go forward, after the U.S. Supreme Court Monday declined to hear an appeal by the companies.

The high court rejected hearing an appeal by companies like Nokia and Cingular Wireless challenging a decision by a U.S. appeals court that reinstated the lawsuits that argued manufacturers knew about and hid the risks of radiation emissions wireless phones posed to users.

Wireless phones are radios that emit frequency radiation and in the United States the Federal Communications Commission must approve any device that sends out such radiation.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement

Exposure to high levels of radiation can cause adverse health effects, but it is less clear the impact on a wireless phone user who is exposed to low levels of radiation when a phone is held to an ear directly.

Health advocates have expressed concerns about radiation causing problems ranging from headaches to tumors. But the wireless industry has pointed to U.S. government statements that scientific evidence so far has not shown any health problems associated with wireless phone use.

Five class-action lawsuits were filed in state courts seeking damages, including money for wireless users to buy a headset or reimburse those who had already had purchased one.

A U.S. district court judge dismissed the five lawsuits on the grounds that state regulation of wireless phone emissions was preempted by the FCC, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit overturned that decision and reinstated the cases.

The wireless industry is worried about being required to adhere to numerous different emissions requirements imposed by states, something the service providers and manufacturers argue would wreak havoc on the industry and consumers.

"This court's intervention is necessary to prevent the balkanization of network standards ... which will, if uncorrected, undermine the ability of consumers to use an FCC-approved wireless telephone in every state of the union," they said in their appeal to the high court.

Other companies that joined in the appeal include Motorola Inc. and Qualcomm Inc. Cingular Wireless is a joint venture of BellSouth Corp. and SBC Communications Inc.

As a result of the high court's action, one lawsuit will go forward in federal court while the four other lawsuits will go forward in state court.

(c) Reuters 2005. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.
   Rate this story    Low   Rate it 0.5Rate it 1Rate it 1.5Rate it 2Rate it 2.5Rate it 3Rate it 3.5Rate it 4Rate it 4.5Rate it 5  High
     • View Top Rated stories

advertisement

advertisement
Shopping on MSN